Write for Us — Business, Health, Tech, Home

Carmannews is an independent daily covering business, health, technology, home, and lifestyle for working adults who want reporting they can actually use. We are a small, named newsroom, and we read every pitch that lands in our inbox. If you report carefully, write clearly, and have something specific to say to that reader, we want to hear from you. This page explains exactly what we publish, the standard your work has to meet, and how to pitch us so a real editor says yes.

Think of this as the full brief, not a form letter. By the end you should know whether your idea fits one of our five desks, what a strong submission looks like, how our review actually runs, and what you can expect back from us. Read it before you write to us. The contributors we end up working with for years are almost always the ones who clearly read it first.

Why write for Carmannews

We will be straight about what a published piece here gets you, because we would rather under-promise. Carmannews is a growing publication, not a mass-traffic machine, and we are not going to quote you reach figures we can’t stand behind. What we can promise is a clean, well-built home for work you are proud of, and editors who treat it seriously.

A real byline and a permanent author profile. Every contributor gets a credited byline and a profile page that collects your Carmannews archive, a short bio, your credentials, and one link of your choosing. We do not publish work under a house name or strip your name off it later.
Editing from a named editor, not an algorithm. Your draft goes to the editor who owns that beat. You get specific, line-level feedback from a person whose name is on the masthead, and a back-and-forth that usually makes the piece sharper than it arrived.
A readership that is small but real, and growing. Our readers come for practical reporting and tend to read to the end. Your piece is published to people who chose this kind of writing, not scattered into a feed.
A design that respects the work. Clean typography, fast pages, no pop-up clutter swallowing your paragraphs. The piece looks the way good writing should look.
A clear standard you can point to. Because our editorial guidelines and ethics policy are public, a Carmannews byline is a small signal in itself: it says the work was sourced and checked against a published bar.

What we don’t offer: guaranteed placement, link-building packages, or coverage you can buy. If that is what you came for, the rest of this page will save us both some time.

What we publish, section by section

Five permanent desks, each with its own editor. The strongest pitches are specific to one of them. Below each beat are example angles we would genuinely read, to calibrate the kind of specificity we want. They are starting points, not a fill-in-the-blank list, and a fresh idea in the same spirit beats a tired one copied off the page.

Business write for us

The business desk covers small-business operations, personal finance, work, and the regulation that shapes them, for readers running or working inside small companies rather than reading quarterly earnings calls. Angles we would take a look at:

A first-person teardown of what a specific licence, permit, or filing actually cost a small business in time and money, with the real numbers.
How a rule change at a named agency lands on a particular trade this quarter, sourced to the rule itself and to operators living with it.
A worked comparison of two ways to handle the same back-office problem, say payroll or invoicing, with the trade-offs an owner faces.
A clear-eyed look at a financial product or service most people misjudge, grounded in the terms rather than the marketing.
A reported answer to a decision readers actually wrestle with: when an LLC stops making sense, how to read a commercial lease, what a SBA loan really requires.

Health write for us

The health desk covers preventive care, the patient’s side of the system, and health policy that changes what care costs or who can get it. This is our most sensitive beat, and the sourcing bar is highest here. Angles we would consider:

A plain walk-through of a screening or preventive decision, built on the current guideline and what it does and doesn’t settle.
How a coverage or pricing change affects access to a specific treatment, sourced to the policy and to people navigating it.
What a new peer-reviewed finding does and does not mean for an ordinary reader, with the study’s limits stated honestly.
A reported guide to a confusing corner of the system: reading an explanation of benefits, appealing a denial, comparing plans on the things that matter.
A clinician’s or patient’s first-hand account that teaches something transferable, not just a personal story.

Health pitches that lean on a single study, promise a cure, or skip the sourcing will not clear review. We would rather run a narrow, careful piece than a sweeping, shaky one.

Technology write for us

The technology desk covers consumer hardware and software with a bias toward repairability, longevity, and getting your money’s worth, for people who keep their devices and want them to last. Angles we would look at:

A hands-on assessment of how repairable a popular device really is, ideally with the teardown or the repair attempt behind it.
What a platform or policy change means in practice for the people who depend on it, traced to the change itself.
A grounded look at whether a much-hyped feature earns its place in daily use, tested rather than assumed.
A clear explainer of a setting, protocol, or default that quietly shapes privacy or cost, written so a non-specialist gets it.
A long-term ownership report: what a device, service, or subscription is actually like to live with a year or two in.

Home improvement write for us

The home desk covers renovation, maintenance, and the residential trades with a focus on cost transparency and decisions homeowners actually face. First-hand experience and licensed trade knowledge carry real weight here. Angles we would consider:

A real project’s cost breakdown, line by line, with where the estimate held and where it slipped.
An honest comparison of two materials or methods for the same job, with the maintenance and lifespan trade-offs spelled out.
A trade professional’s guide to a job homeowners routinely get wrong, or wrongly pay too much for.
How to read a contractor’s bid and spot what is missing, written by someone who has been on both sides of one.
A maintenance task most people skip until it gets expensive, with the timing and the cost of waiting.

Lifestyle write for us

The lifestyle desk covers travel, food, and the practical edges of everyday life, with a hard preference for first-hand reporting over roundups. We hold a strict no-comp policy on reviews. Angles we would look at:

A budget-travel or travel-with-kids piece built on a trip you actually took, with the real costs and the things that went wrong.
A test of a widely repeated piece of advice, kitchen, packing, or otherwise, with what held up and what didn’t.
A guide to doing one specific thing well that most write-ups gloss over, from someone who has done it many times.
A clear-eyed look at a product category readers overspend on, grounded in use rather than affiliate incentives.
A reported answer to a small recurring question, the kind people search for at 11pm and never get a straight reply to.

Not sure which desk fits? Pick the closest one and say so in your pitch. A near-miss aimed at the right editor still gets read; a piece addressed to no desk in particular usually doesn’t.

What we don’t accept

Knowing what we turn down will save you a wasted draft. We decline, without much further discussion:

Thin or AI-spun content. Generic, padded, or machine-generated drafts that restate what is already on the first page of search results. We can tell, and so can the reader.
Undisclosed sponsored or affiliate pieces. Anything written to sell a product or push a client, dressed up as editorial. Paid placement is not for sale here, in any form.
Plagiarism or recycled work. Copied passages, lightly reworded sources, or a piece already published elsewhere or submitted to other outlets at the same time.
Keyword-stuffed link bait. Posts built around a backlink, with the keyword wedged in and the reader an afterthought. The give-away is usually an unrelated commercial link in paragraph two.
Medical or financial claims without sourcing. Advice that could affect someone’s health or money and rests on assertion rather than a citable source. This is a hard line on the health and business desks especially.
Press-release rewrites. A company announcement reflowed into article shape, with no independent reporting or reader’s-eye assessment added.

Editorial standards and the quality bar

The same bar that governs our staff reporting governs contributor work. It is the reason a Carmannews byline means something, and it is non-negotiable. Read our editorial guidelines and ethics policy in full before you pitch; what follows is the short version.

Original and first-hand wherever possible. The pieces that do best here are reported, tested, or lived, not assembled from other articles. If you have done the thing, that is your edge, and it is what we are buying.
Every factual claim is sourced. Link to the primary source, the filing, the study, the guideline, the company’s own statement, not a secondary aggregator. Where a source isn’t public, describe it inline and be ready to show your editor the original.
Real expertise, fairly represented. Write inside what you actually know. We are glad to publish a sharp piece on a narrow thing you understand deeply, and wary of a broad one you half-understand.
Experience, expertise, authority, trust. Those are the qualities Google’s quality raters look for, and they happen to be the ones a careful editor looks for too. Show your footing: name your sources, show your method, disclose anything that could colour the piece.
No conflicts left buried. If you hold a position in, consult for, or have any stake in what you are writing about, tell us up front. Some of it is disqualifying; most of it just needs to be disclosed.

Content and formatting guidelines

Once a pitch is accepted, here is the shape we are after. None of it is fussy for its own sake; each rule exists to make the piece clearer or to keep it publishable.

Length. Most Carmannews pieces run between 700 and 1,500 words, and we do not pad. A tight 800-word piece that says one thing well beats a 2,000-word piece circling it. Deeper guides and reported features can run longer when the reporting earns it, which is a conversation to have with your editor at the pitch stage.
Structure. Lead with the point. Use descriptive subheads, short paragraphs, and lists where they genuinely help a reader scan. A clear nut graph near the top, telling the reader what they will get and why it matters, goes a long way.
Originality. The piece must be unique to Carmannews and not published, in whole or part, anywhere else, including your own blog. We ask for first publication, and we do not run syndicated or previously posted work.
Links. Link generously to primary sources and to relevant context, including our own related coverage where it fits. We do not run paid, irrelevant, or spammy links, and any commercial relationship behind a link has to be disclosed. One sensible link in your author bio is fine; the body of the piece is for the reader, not for SEO.
Images. If you supply images, they must be yours or properly licensed, with the source and any attribution noted. Don’t paste in anything you found on a search engine. We will tell you the sizes we need once you are commissioned.
AI disclosure. We do not publish AI-drafted reporting. If you used an AI tool for anything beyond a spell-check, say so when you submit. Undisclosed AI use ends the working relationship; an honest note about a research aid does not.

Your author bio and how we promote your work

Your contributor bio is short and real. It carries your name, a sentence or two on who you are and the relevant experience that earns you the byline, and one link, to your site, your portfolio, or a profile of your choosing. We keep bios honest and tight; this isn’t ad space, and an overstuffed bio gets trimmed.

When your piece runs, it carries your byline at the top and feeds into your author profile, where your Carmannews work collects in one place. We credit you on the page, and we share pieces through the channels we own. We won’t promise viral numbers, and we won’t claim an audience we don’t have, but your work is published properly, attributed clearly, and given a fair push.

The submission process, step by step

We work from a pitch, not a finished draft. Please don’t send a complete article cold; send the idea first, and let an editor shape it with you before you write. The path looks like this:

You pitch. Email the relevant desk a short, specific pitch (the next section spells out exactly what to include). One idea per email works best.
We respond. The desk editor reads it and replies, accepted, declined, or accepted with a different angle. We aim to get back to every pitch within about five business days. If you haven’t heard from us in two weeks, a single polite nudge is welcome.
You draft. If it is a yes, your editor confirms the angle, the rough length, and a deadline. Then you write the piece to the standard set out above.
We edit. Your editor reads the draft and comes back with notes, on structure, sourcing, clarity, and accuracy. Expect a real edit, not a rubber stamp. Most pieces go through at least one round.
You revise. You address the notes. Anything we can’t verify gets cut or sourced. We may go another round if the piece needs it; we would rather take an extra pass than publish something thin.
We publish. Once it clears, we schedule it, attach your byline and bio, and it goes live with your name on it and a place in your author archive.

How to pitch us

A good pitch is short and tells an editor everything they need to say yes. Keep it under about 300 words and include:

A working title or one-line summary. What is the piece, in a sentence?
The angle. What is new, specific, or first-hand here? What does the reader walk away knowing or able to do that they couldn’t before?
Why it fits the desk. Name the section and say, in a line, why it belongs there and why now.
Your sourcing. Who or what is behind the piece, the documents, the data, the people on record, or the experience you are drawing on.
Your background. A sentence on who you are and why you are the person to write this. Relevant experience beats a long CV.
Two or three sample links. Published work that shows how you write. If you are just starting out, send your best two pieces from anywhere, including a personal site.

Put the desk name in the subject line (Business, Health, Technology, Home, or Lifestyle) so it reaches the right editor. A focused pitch to the correct desk is the single biggest thing you can do to get a yes.

Do’s and don’ts

Do

Read our editorial guidelines and a few recent pieces before pitching, so your idea lands in the right register.
Pitch one specific, well-sourced idea aimed at one desk.
Lead with what is new or first-hand; that is what separates a yes from a no.
Link your claims to primary sources, and keep the originals where they aren’t public.
Disclose any conflict, any commercial relationship, and any use of AI tools up front.
Take the edit seriously and turn revisions around when you say you will.

Don’t

Send a finished article cold, or the same piece to several outlets at once.
Pitch a thinly reworded version of something already ranking on the topic.
Build the piece around a backlink, or bury a client’s link in the body.
Make health or money claims you can’t source, or lean a whole piece on one study.
Submit AI-generated drafts, or pass off a press release as reporting.
Send a one-line “do you accept guest posts?” with a link list and nothing else.

Contributor FAQ

Do you pay contributors?

Yes. Accepted commissions are paid, with the rate agreed in writing before you start, based on the length, the reporting involved, and the depth of the piece. We pay on publication. We don’t run an open rate card here because what a brief and a reported feature are worth differ a lot, so the number is settled with your editor at the commissioning stage. We do not charge a fee to publish, ever; any outlet asking you to pay to appear is not running editorial.

Do you accept previously published work?

No. We ask for original work and first publication. The piece can’t have appeared elsewhere, including on your own blog or social channels, and it shouldn’t be under review at another outlet at the same time. If you have an idea you have explored before, pitch a fresh, reported take written specifically for us.

How long until I hear back?

We aim to respond to every pitch within about five business days, whether the answer is yes or no. We are a small newsroom, so busy weeks can run longer. If two weeks pass with no reply, send one short follow-up; it is welcome, and it sometimes just means your first email got buried.

Can I include links to my own site?

One relevant link in your author bio, yes, that is standard and expected. Inside the body of the piece, links should serve the reader, point to primary sources, and be relevant to the story. We don’t run paid, off-topic, or promotional links, and anything with a commercial relationship behind it has to be disclosed. Pieces built around a link rather than a reader don’t get published.

Do you accept AI-written drafts?

No. We do not publish AI-drafted reporting, even with a human review on top. If you used an AI tool for anything more than a spell-check, disclose it when you submit. We are looking for original reporting, testing, and first-hand experience, which is exactly what a generated draft can’t supply.

Will my piece stay up?

That is the plan. We publish to keep, and we don’t quietly pull work or unpublish contributor pieces to chase trends. The rare exceptions are if something turns out to be inaccurate or to breach our standards and can’t be fixed with a correction. When we do correct a piece, we log it openly on our corrections page rather than editing the past silently.

Can I update my piece later?

Often, yes. If a story you wrote needs an update because facts changed or you have new reporting, email your editor and we will look at it. Substantive updates are noted so the record stays honest. What we don’t do is swap in new links or edit a live piece for SEO reasons after the fact.

Do I need to be a professional journalist?

No. We care about the work, not the title. A licensed contractor writing on renovation costs, a clinician on a screening decision, or a small-business owner on what a filing really took can write exactly the kind of first-hand, sourced piece we want. What you do need is genuine knowledge of your subject and the willingness to source your claims and take an edit.

How to submit

Ready to pitch? Email your idea to [email protected] with the desk name, Business, Health, Technology, Home, or Lifestyle, in the subject line. Keep it under about 300 words, include two or three sample links, and tell us why this piece, for this desk, now.

Not sure your idea is the right fit, or want to introduce yourself before pitching? You can reach the newsroom through our contact page. If you would rather get a feel for the place first, read the about page, meet the editorial team you would be working with, and look through the business, health, technology, home, and lifestyle archives to see the standard. Then send us something specific. We are reading.

Write for carmannews

On this page